Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Captain Thunk
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
175
|
Posted - 2015.10.06 18:17:30 -
[1] - Quote
Told ya you could verify Skype logs :) |

Captain Thunk
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
178
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 12:45:57 -
[2] - Quote
ImYourMom wrote:TurboX3 wrote:This is crap from CCP... when PL can field 3 teams within AT.... yet again CCP shows it's incompetence as an authority figure. I completely agree how PL was allowed to field 3 teams was a complete joke when other alliances were refused entry. Clearly PL has always been favoured by CCP. To be honest AT is just one big fix and I rellay have no interest anymore it because its just tainted
None of the "PL Teams" ever fought each other so there was no opportunity for collusion. That's before you go into scrimming together, sharing resources and the rest which were legal but PL did not do. The three teams are entirely independent whether you want to accept that or not. I doubt next years rules will allow Waffles or Horde to compete due to their proximity to PL, which is understandable considering the position CCP have been put in by people who don't understand the difference between metagaming and cheating.
Good decision CCP and Logibro.
I'm kinda glad Kadesh decided to have a public meltdown on FHC and confessed they did infact cheat as well as possibly more, as it validates the fact that CCP were spot on with their decision. |

Captain Thunk
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
178
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 14:05:54 -
[3] - Quote
OmgNoFreeNames wrote:And why he had to post it on failheap instead of using this forum?
Because you're not allowed to discuss cheating or exploits one eve-o
|

Captain Thunk
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
180
|
Posted - 2015.10.07 17:15:10 -
[4] - Quote
ImYourMom wrote:W0lf Crendraven wrote:I also want to say that i disagree with the final placings, while nulli indeed lost to pl neither the tuskers nor exodus did. They simply got seeded in a different spot and had to to meet hydramel twice before pl had to, which - just as pl, knocked them out.
In that persective, 3 of the top 4 went unbeated by any legit tournament team, crowing any one of them as the number 1 is wrong and unfair.
Simply not crowning a victor and destributing the prices in a even matter amongst the top 4 would be by far the better ruling. I absolutely agree with this. IF ANYTHING CCP should of just had rematch with the next top 3. Completely wrong to allow PL 1st. Makespecially me feel CCP are now cheating. .
Why does it apply now when PL were already getting more ships than 4th or 5th when it was placed 3rd?
The logic you're using still applied, but you didn't mind then. Why do you mind now and why aren't you consistent with your beliefs?
I don't think you can use selective logic when it suits you and expect people to agree.
If you were sincere, which let's face it you're not, you would have said this before, asking CCP why PL was placed 3rd and getting more prizes than 4th or 5th when PL hadn't proven itself to be better than those teams. |
|
|